Sunday, 9 February 2014

SC or ST persons moved from his/her State or UT of his/her permanent place of residence into another State or UT within a territory of India, he/she cannot be said to have migrated into another State or UT within the territory of India.


             
            A meaning of word "migration", "ordinarily resident ", “domicile” and “origin” are briefly explained by Five Judge Bench of the earlier Hon’ble Apex Court in the Case of SMT. SHANNO DEVI Vs. MANGAL SAIN Reported in 1961 AIR 58, : 1961 SCR (1) 576 as follows :-
                 
                 For all these reasons it appears clear that when the framers of the Constitution used the words "migrated to the territory of India" they intended "come to the territory of India with the intention of residing there permanently". The only explanation of 'their not expressly mentioning "domicile" or the "intention to reside permanently" in Art. 6 seems to be that they were confident that in the scheme of this Constitution the word "1st   migration" could only be interpreted to mean "come to the country with the intention of residing there permanently".
                
             In support of this contention is that the word ’migrate’ means going to another Country an intention of residing there permanently or a person  come from another country with an intention for residing permanently to a Country.

                  In other words, under the Article 6 of the Constitution of India though at the point of time “a person moved from his permanent place of residence of a State into a new place of another State within a Country, he cannot be said to have migrated to this place or State/UT within a Country.”

                Meaning of "migration", “domicile”, “origin” and "ordinarily resident" are given under the  Article 5,6,7 and 8 of the Constitution of India.